Home > Vitamins > Multi Vitamins > Child / Teens >

Kid's & Teen's Multivitamins & Minerals - 30 Chewable Tablets
Kid's & Teen's Multivitamins & Minerals -  30 Chewable Tablets

Alternative Views:

Kid's & Teen's Multivitamins & Minerals
30 Chewable Tabs


Proudly Made in the USA!

Also Available in a 90 Count $24.99 (Save 35%)

Also Available in a 180 Count $39.99

(Save 48%)

We Consider This Children’s Multivitamin the Best in the World, Sold Anywhere at Any Price!

They Taste Amazing and Your Kids Won't Even Know Their Multivitamin is Loaded With Phyto Fruits & Veggies:

21 Fruits & Veggies - Digestive Support - Whole Food Based - Immune Building - Antioxidants & Enzymes

Fruits and Veggies:
Carrots, Broccoli, Spinach, Celery, Beets, Green Beans, Parsley, Orange Juice, Raspberries, Apples, Apricots, Peaches, Cherries, Pineapples, Plums, Figs, Rose Hips, Kelp, Curcumin, Mixed Tocopherols, and Acerola Cherry Juice.

  • 100% of Vitamins: A, C, D3, E, B1, B2, B3, B6, Folate and B12
  • A Full Spectrum of Vitamins, Minerals, and Enzymes.
  • Vitamin A (as natural beta carotene – Pro-Vitamin A)
  • Vitamin C w/ Bioflavonoids -120mg. 300% Daily Allowance
  • Vitamin D3 400 IU – Vitamin E
  • Vitamin K, Zinc, Iron, Selenium, Magnesium, Biotin, Phosphorus, Copper, and so much more.
  • Enzyme Blend: Amylase, Protease, Lipase that gently strengthens the immune and digestive system.
  • Non-GMO, Gluten Free, Wheat Free, Lactose-Free
  • Starch Free, Milk Free, and Yeast Free
  • Sugar-Free – Soy Free - 100% Vegetarian & Vegan
  • No Artificial Flavors, No Artificial Sweeteners, No Waxes, No Solvents
  • Sweetened with the Oranges, Pineapple, Citric Acid, & Acerola Cherry Juice only, not Sucralose.

Read Below: Full Description, Clinical Studies & Research on Kids Multis.

Our Price:


Description Supplement Facts

They Taste Amazing! Kind of like a Sweet-Tart, Your Kids Won't Even Know They Are Getting:

Carrots, Broccoli, Spinach, Celery, Beets, Green Beans, Parsley, Orange Juice, Raspberries, Apples, Apricots, Peaches, Cherries, Pineapples, Plums, Figs, Rose Hips, Kelp, Curcumin, Mixed Tocopherols, and Acerola Cherry Juice.

Also Available in a 90 Count $24.99 (Save 35%) Also Available in a 180 Count $39.99 (Save 48%)

  • Children's Brains Grow the Most in the First 5 Years of Life and reach 90% of its Final Size During This Time.
  • These Multi's Setup Healthy Habits that are Vital Health, Vitality, Growing and Changes that Happen Daily.
  • These Multi's Packed with Phyto Fruits and Veggies Provide Real Fuel, Not Temporary Sugar Fuel that Brings the Crashes Parents Dred.
  • Creating Strong Teeth and Bones from an Early Age is so Important for Life.
  • No Matter How Picky Your Kids are, these Multi's are Gap Fillers. Making Sure they get the right nutrients every day.

During this time of your child's life their brain is setting the foundation for all mental capacities for life, their health is formulating whether they will be a healthy child as well as all of their bodily functions are growing & processing to ensure efficiencies for the rest of their lives. No time is more critical to help with their nutritional intake than this time as kids can be picky eaters and not get what they truly need to grow and be healthy and reach their full potential.

Our Kids’ Multi is a Phyto Nutrient Whole Food-based multivitamin/mineral supplement enriched with Phyto Fruits and Phyto Veggies. Complete B-complex formula balanced for mental clarity and immune strength. LifeSource Vitamins Children’s Multivitamin contains Beta Carotene Pro-Vitamin A, Bioflavonoids, and 400 IU of Vitamin D3, as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Loaded with antioxidants provided by our Phyto Fruits and Veggies to protect kids from environmental pollutants and stress. And they are SUGAR-FREE, not like most other major brands that are packed with unnatural sugar, sucrose, sucralose or other harmful sweeteners! Ours is sweetened simply by the Phyto Fruits inside these Kids’ Multi’s.

  • Pediatrician & Dentist approved
  • 100% All natural
  • Non-GMO Ingredients
  • No artificial sweeteners, flavors, or preservatives colors
  • Gluten-Free & Dairy Free
  • Not processed with egg, milk, peanut, tree nuts, wheat, soy, fish or shellfish.
  • Sweetened with the fruit in the vitamin.
  • Contains 0 grams of sugar (free of aspartame or high fructose corn syrup)
  • Made in the USA with all USA ingredients
  • Made in accordance with current FDA guidelines
  • Safe for kids aged 2 and up, even great for Teens!
  • Vegetarian

See All LifeSource Vitamins Kids Products, Articles and, Studies: Click Here

Children need a sound nutritional basis upon which to grow and develop, so it's important to ensure that they eat a balanced diet. Of course, many children do not eat the right foods, opting instead for fast foods and foods containing more sugar than nutritional value. In order to ensure that your children get all the nutrients needed, you may choose to give them a daily vitamin. However, the last thing you want in that vitamin is a bunch of sugar. So what is a parent to do? Try LifeSource Vitamins pride and joy for your kids, which is a multivitamin formulated specifically to ensure that children receive the nutrients they need to properly support their bodies during their years of growth and development.*

LifeSource Vitamins Children's Chewable is a naturally flavored, good tasting, multiple vitamin and mineral supplement with added ingredients that go well beyond the sugar pills of today. LifeSource Children Multi does not only contain the vitamins and minerals that are normally found in a children's vitamin, but it also contains the full spectrum of all vitamins and minerals classified as "essential.", an essential vitamin is one needed by the body but not produced by it. Therefore, they must be obtained from our diet or supplements. LifeSource Children's Multi also contains trace minerals and associated nutrients that are very important to a child's growth and development. *

As important as taking a quality Multivitamin is for adults as stated by the American Medical Association, a majority of your children's future is decided by the decisions you as parents, grandparents, or family and friends make for what goes in their precious bodies. Giving your child the foundation of good health while growing up is so very important. Most kids are still going to eat fast food, potato chips, etc, but if they have the foundation set, it will help their mental clarity at school, it will help them sleep better, play longer, be sick much less if at all, imagine, no more colds. Our Multi's provide every nutrient that your children's growing body truly needs as well as fruits and veggies.*

LifeSource Vitamins Kid's & Teen's Chewables were developed by our team of pediatricians, biochemists, and a pharmacist with years of experience in this field. We saw a need for a totally comprehensive whole food-based multiple vitamins for children and LifeSource Vitamins the company was formed for that very reason.

For all practical purposes, most all other chewable products available are made in a base of regular table sugar and flavored with synthetic substances so they will taste like candy. They are all loaded with different synthetic food coloring agents. (Studies have been done in several public school systems proving that the various food additives, including coloring agents, cause hyperkinetic children). These so-called "nutritional products" usually gain their appeal by widespread intensive TV advertising, not because of their nutritional value.

LifeSource Vitamins Children’s Chewables are flavored from the fruits in these vitamins, nothing else. Our Chewables do not contain any artificial coloring, flavoring agents or preservatives. Natural Beta-Carotene, which is totally safe, and is used as the source of Vitamin A. As in all LifeSource products, the Vitamin D found in our chewables is natural Vitamin D-3 from fish liver oil. Also included are oil-soluble Vitamins E and Vitamin K.

Fact: It is definitely not surprising that most (90% or more) of Americans do not meet their recommended daily intake of vitamins due to their diets, and kids have even a bigger challenge, but here is the really surprising part, even the individuals who eat their suggested/recommended daily servings of fruits and vegetables still do not receive their proper daily intake of vitamins and minerals that are needed for our bodies to operate efficiently. How is this? Our modern processing, mass production, and the way we cook or our food get cooked for us have been found to be far less nutritious than in years past. To put this into perspective, it takes several more cups of fruits and vegetables today to equal one cup of that same fruit or veggie from just 50 years ago.

Fact: Why do we need Whole Food Based Multivitamins? There are numerous carefully controlled health and food studies that have shown that by the time the food makes it to our tables we have lost sometimes as much as 50% of the nutrients of the particular foods we are eating. yes, 50%!


Children 4 years and above take 2 tablets daily and children under 4 years of age take 1 tablet daily.

* Because heat destroys the activity of many vitamins, enzymes, and phytonutrients, LifeSource Vitamins employs only cold processing manufacturing techniques. Even though cold processing is costly and time-consuming, it is the standard procedure at LifeSource Vitamins.

** Contains no preservatives, sugar, starch, salt, wheat, yeast, corn, milk, soy derivatives, artificial flavoring or coloring agents.

*** No sucrose, no yeast, no artificial flavor, no artificial color. Just vitamins and minerals from A to Z.

LifeSource Vitamins Children's Multivitamins & Minerals. Our Kids’ multi is a Phyto Nutrient Whole Food-based multivitamin/mineral supplement enriched with Phyto Fruits and Phyto Veggies. Loaded with antioxidants to protect kids from environmental pollutants and stress and sweetened simply by the Phyto Fruits inside these Kids’ Multi’s.

A Daily Multivitamin Supplement can Boost Brain Function, UK Researchers Say: by Owen Fertel

Did you know that a simple multivitamin supplement, taken daily, can boost your brain’s ability to function? That’s exactly what teams of British neuroscientists are saying in a new series of studies published in the British Journal of Nutrition, Psychopharmacology, and Human Psychopharmacology. Their main focus in these studies was to investigate what effects multivitamin supplements have on mood and brain function. Here’s what they found.

After monitoring the mood and brain function of several groups of healthy men, women, and children who had taken store bought vitamin supplements for a 4-12 week period, the researchers found that the vitamin supplements boosted their brain functioning after just a few weeks of taking their vitamins. All groups – men, women, and children – had more mental energy, alertness, and accuracy in the challenges given to them. Taking large doses of B-complex vitamins increased these effects, particularly in men. Supplementing subjects with Omega 3s in 1-2g amounts, while not directly affecting their brain function, did increase cerebral blood flow while they were participating in cognitive tests. Professor David Kennedy of the Brain, Performance, and Nutrition Research Center at Northumbria University and one of the co-authors of the study, said that this suggests dietary DHA (an Omega 3 fat) influences brain function in physiological terms.* This fact has big implications for aging healthily, as well as for dementia.

These effects are the result of subjects having Optimal levels of the vitamins in their systems. Optimal, Dr. Kennedy goes on to say, is way above the level required to avoid deficiency and disease. Think of it in terms of grades – If you’ve gotten to the required levels of a vitamin, you are getting C’s. You pass, but no one gives you an award. If you’ve reached optimal levels, then you are getting an A. To get you’re A’s, Dr. Kennedy recommends a multivitamin, as many people are deficient in several vitamin groups. A good multivitamin should cover your bases and patch up whatever you may be deficient in.



Everything seems to contain aspartame today. I have an eight-month-old son. Is aspartame safe for use in children?

PEDIATRICIAN DR.PAUL Answers: A very good question that makes me think of a few other "inactive" ingredients found in food and drug products.

In fact, there are over 700 chemical agents including aspartame, coloring dyes, preservatives in food and asthma medications which have been FDA approved for use as "inactive ingredients". They are labeled as inactive, as they presumably do not have any effect on the people consuming them.

For example, the active ingredient in a chewable fever tablet would be acetaminophen. The aspartame, an inactive component, acts as an artificial sweetener but presumably has no other effects.

Looking specifically at your concern, aspartame is being increasingly used in chewable tablets and other sugar-free medications, as well as in diet sodas, gum, and sweetened foods such as pudding and cereal. While considered safe in children, there have been some concerns about aspartame in children with inborn metabolic problems such as PKU (or phenylketonuria).

In normal children, it can be taken safely in small amounts. However, when a small child drinks a 12-ounce can of diet soda he consumes almost twice the daily amount considered safe.

What are the effects of aspartame? Although there are not that many studies, some reports suggest symptoms that may include headache (especially in patients prone to migraines), mood changes, dizziness and panic attacks. There is no link between aspartame use and aggressive or hyperactive behaviors in children. The bottom line is: taken in small amounts, such as in medications I think aspartame is safe. But we should not take the fact that it is labeled as inactive at face value.

How Safe IS Aspartame?

WARNING: Side effects may include: Seizures. Depression. Brain damage. Memory loss. Migraine headaches. Numbness. Blindness (57-66). Serious sounding repercussions. Surely the FDA would warn you if it knew a common product might trigger reactions like these.

NOT SO. This substance, sweetly packaged, rests quietly on tabletops, in soft drinks, chewing gum, vitamins and in medicines (37-55). The illusion it portrays is as free of warning as a Sunday stroll in the park. Consumers recognize it by its attractive red and white swirled logo and are drawn by its promise of an all-natural, low-calorie, sweet flavor. In a country obsessed by dieting and abhorrent of the perceived sins of sugar, this product has gained unprecedented popularity since it was discovered accidentally thirty years ago by a chemist mixing chemicals in search of medicine to relieve ulcers. NutraSweet. Equal. Equal Measure. Spoonful. It's brand names are ubiquitous in food and food products as it corners the market on low-calorie sweeteners. Aspartame, as it is known generically, skyrocketed to its position as the most popular sugar substitute in the world shortly after it gained approval for public consumption. Worldwide, the aspartame industry's sales of the product amount to over $1 billion yearly. (58) In the United States, NutraSweet enjoys a $700 million sales share and shows no signs of retreat. (58,68)

The NutraSweet group became a part of G.D. Searle Company, a pharmaceutical business, after one of its chemists discovered the sweetener, and realized the sales potential of a sugar substitute. Searle and NutraSweet are now owned by Monsanto Company. Producers of NutraSweet maintain their platform that the safety of aspartame has been confirmed. They cite affirmation of aspartame by a number of agencies and organizations nationwide, including the American Medical Association, the World Health Organization, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Diabetes Association, the American Dietetic Association, and the American Epilepsy Association. Yet aspartame came amazingly close to not being approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the first place. What aspartame actually is, and how it affects certain individuals, is at the heart of a continuing controversy over its increasing distribution in food (including food served in hospitals), medicine, candy, confections, cereal, soft drinks, and scores of other products.

Known chemically as aspartame (C14H18O5), NutraSweet is a compound composed of the following chemicals by weight: methanol (10%), aspartic acid (40%), and phenylalanine (50%). In dry form, the composition is stable, however, when placed in liquid it can break down into its component parts (methanol, aspartate, and phenylalanine). Heat will speed its breakdown. Another breakdown product is diketopiperazine (DKP). In certain combinations, these elements can result in adverse reactions in some people. Methanol further breaks down into formaldehyde and formic acid, both known to cause serious side effects in sensitive individuals. (58,64,67,69)

The RANDOM HOUSE DICTIONARY defines methanol (also known as methyl alcohol) "as a colorless, poisonous liquid used chiefly as a solvent, fuel, etc." (70) Methanol is on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Community Right to Know List, and is reported in EPA's Toxic Substances Control Act Inventory. Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials states methanol is "a human poison by ingestion." (71)

The levels of methanol are quite low in a single serving of a product containing aspartame, provided that it has not been exposed to heat or left for a long time on the shelf. Because these factors promote the breakdown of aspartame into its component parts, researchers are concerned that high consumption levels combined with aspartame's unstable shelf life may allow methanol to reach toxic levels in some cases. (21,72) Human systemic effects from methanol include changes in circulation, cough, headache, nausea, and vomiting, optic nerve neuropathy, respiratory effects, and visual field changes. In experiments, it has shown teratogenic (birth defects) and adverse reproductive effects.

Genetic mutations from methanol have been reported in human tissue. Methanol is classified as a narcotic. (71) According to Sax, methanol's "main toxic effect is exerted upon the nervous system, particularly the optic nerve, and possibly the retinae which can progress to permanent blindness. Once absorbed, methanol is only very slowly eliminated. Coma resulting from massive exposures may last as long as 2-4 days. In the body, the products formed by its oxidation are formaldehyde and formic acid, both of which are toxic. Because of the slow elimination, methanol should be regarded as a cumulative poison. Though single exposures to fumes may cause no harmful effect, daily exposure may result in the accumulation of sufficient methanol in the body to cause illness. Death from ingestion of fewer than 30 ml (milliliters) has been reported." (71) Phenylalanine is an amino acid. However, at high levels, it can cause brain damage. People with phenylketonuria are at risk for brain damage if they consume even just one liter of aspartame-sweetened soda pop in a day because the disease inhibits the body's ability to metabolize it. (67,72)

The FDA and the Centers for Disease Control have received nearly 7,000 complaints, including five deaths, attributed to the use of aspartame in food products since the FDA first permitted limited use in 1981. (39,47,56) A number of researchers and doctors around the country object not only to the product itself but to the questionable preliminary research that led the FDA to approve it for use in dry products in 1981. Aspartame was the accidental discovery of chemist Jim Schlatter, who was working or Searle on an anti-ulcer drug. It was December 1965; Schlatter licked his finger and tasted the substance that had spilled on his flask. It's sweetness stunned him, and he realized that tiny amounts of the chemicals he'd been mixing were powerfully sweet. Searle began testing the chemical mixture - aspartame - and it eventually gained FDA approval, but not without concerns about its safety. A consumer hotline was organized in 1987 to answer questions about the sweetener and its potentially deleterious effects. (74) Doctors and researchers have protested both it's us and the research that led to its approval. A number of books have been published denouncing and challenging its self-portrayed description as an innocuous food additive. And victims of its side effects are listed in doctors' case studies. (1.57-66,75,76,79

After reviewing the scientific and medical literature on aspartame published since 1970, Cherry Gaffney, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology concluded aspartame’s ingestion may lead to blood pressure instability and perceptual disorders in some persons. She said that additional studies were necessary to evaluate the impact of aspartame on aviation. (65) Her warning was directed to pilots whose performance could be affected by using the substance. The organization of the Aspartame Consumer Safety Network in 1987 was the direct result of the founder's nightmarish encounter with aspartame.

In 1989 Mary Stoddard related her physical and emotional decline in 1984 during an attempt to lose weight. She said she experienced dozens of symptoms that she'd never had before. She described ringing in her ears, tremors, weakness in her limbs, muscle cramping, twitching, blocked ears, skin lesions, depression, sinus congestion, blurred vision, joint pains, and hearing loss. Stoddard did not have symptoms until she started using diet products, like soft drinks, which contained aspartame. As she continued to use more and more diet products containing aspartame, she observed her symptoms worsened. Stoddard did not initially link aspartame to her symptoms. She believed that a healthy diet and regular exercise would make her feel physically better, but she continued to have health problems that had no apparent source. She said that she sought medical help, but received conflicting advice. She said she eventually began to suspect the products containing aspartame in her diet were creating her problems after she traced the onset of the symptoms to aspartame use, and on that hunch, she decided to eliminate NutraSweet from her diet. She began to feel better immediately after removing the products containing aspartame from her diet, but Stoddard said it took six months for the symptoms to completely recede. At one point during her recovery, she inadvertently ingested a food product containing aspartame and had a recurrence of the symptoms. She then had no doubt that aspartame was the root cause of her unusual reactions. In 1987, three years after her own adverse reactions to NutraSweet, Stoddard formed the Aspartame Consumer Safety Network to help others afflicted with aspartame sensitivity problems. Some specialize in food and nutrition have spoken out against aspartame use.

Woodrow Monte, R.D., Ph.D., director of the Arizona State University Food Sciences and Nutrition Laboratory, is uncomfortable with the methanol content of aspartame. In a 1986 interview, Monte called aspartame "a crime against humanity." "Humans are 100 times more sensitive to methanol than animals. When you ingest aspartame, it breaks down into methanol within one hour of ingestion. Methanol forms as soon as aspartame goes into solution and increases the longer it is in solution." according to Monte. Because heat speeds the breakdown of aspartame into methanol if aspartame is added to coffee or tea at 80 degrees C (145 degrees F), one half of the amount breaks down into methanol in 10 minutes, according to Monte. This raises serious concern about ASPARTAME 'S 1993 approval for use in baked goods and other heated products, like hot cocoa and tea. Although aspartame came about as the result of a search for a drug, and its compounds were the basis for a potential prescription medication, the petition for approval of NutraSweet was based on the premise that it was a food additive. The FDA followed its precedent of permitting manufacturers to conduct their own product safety research.

Monte feels that aspartame was mislabeled from the beginning. "Aspartame is a drug, not a food additive," he said. "One hundred million people, from little babies to the elderly, are consuming this stuff in mega doses, more than they ever would if it were labeled a drug."

Dr. Jacqueline Verrett, a former FDA toxicologist, and member of an FDA task force that investigated the authenticity of research done by Searle to establish the safety of aspartame says she believes the original aspartame studies were "built on a foundation of sand." (20) She testified in front of a U.S. Senate hearing in 1987 that flawed tests conducted by Searle - used as the basis of FDA approval - were a "disaster" and should have been "thrown out." She said she believed the studies left many unanswered questions about possible birth defects and the safety of aspartame. (20)

Verrett said the team was instructed not to be concerned with, or comment upon, the overall validity of the study. She said a subsequent review discarded or ignored the problems and deficiencies outlined by her team's original report. She said, "serious departures from acceptable toxicological protocols" that her investigative team noted in the revaluation of these studies were also discounted. (20)

She warned that any of the improper practices would compromise and negate a safety study of a food additive. Verrett concluded the data in the study was worthless, and the safety of aspartame and its breakdown products have therefore not been determined. (20) She emphasized that aspartame exists in the marketplace without basic toxicity information. She said there are no data to assess the interactions with DKP, excess phenylalanine, other aspartame metabolites, additives, drugs, or other chemicals. In her testimony, Verrett elaborated on DKP problems, including significant increases of uterine polyps and changes in blood cholesterol. DKP is formed when liquids, in particular, are pre-sweetened with aspartame. The production of DKP is vulnerable to an increase in temperature and higher temperatures produce increasing amounts of DKP. She reminded members of the Congressional Committee "that is why initially, aspartame was not intended or not planned to be used in liquids because of this decomposition...it was decided it was too unstable to be used in hot preparations, hot liquids, and also in diet drinks." (20)

Senator Howard Metzenbaum (D-OH), chairman of the hearing when Verrett testified, asked her if she disagreed with the FDA's position that tests for aspartame safety were credible. Verrett succinctly said she disagreed. (20) Dr. H. J. Roberts, a Florida internist, and author, cites case studies of individuals adversely affected by aspartame use. (75) In one case described by Roberts, the destruction left in the wake of aspartame use was so debilitating that a college honor student deteriorated from the brain damage and finally had to be institutionalized because her mental retardation was so severe. Roberts said he treated the 18-year-old student in 1986 because of "profound intellectual deterioration" that followed her use of aspartame products for weight control The young woman suffered mental incapacitation that destroyed her academic goal when she had a drop of 20 IQ points, according to Roberts, who said prior to use of the aspartame she had been an outstanding student at a major university, as well as a skilled typist and pianist. Her skills had rapidly declined according to Roberts, by the time of her first visit to his office. Her physical complaints included headaches, decreasing vision in one eye, dizziness, intense drowsiness, tremors, insomnia, suicidal depression, itching, burning on urination, personality change, abdominal pain, recurrent nausea, loss of menstrual cycle, and an ironic 15-pound weight gain. Roberts said extensive neuro-physical tests were conducted on the woman, and no consistent patterns were found for a primary disorder or schizophrenia. When he noted the woman experienced drowsiness after ingesting aspartame drinks and dozed while driving, he advised her to avoid aspartame, and to follow an anti-hypoglycemic diet with medication. Avoidance of aspartame relieved her symptoms, but the apparent brain damage remained, requiring her placement in a facility for the mentally retarded. (75)

In a recent study investigating the consequences of aspartame on people with mood disorders, Ralph Walton, M.D., Robert Hudak, Ph.D., and Ruth J. Green-Waite concluded: "individuals with mood disorders are particularly sensitive to this artificial sweetener (aspartame) and its use in this population should be discouraged." (60) Walton said their study was terminated after only 20 days by the Institutional Review Board of Western Reserve Care System, Youngstown, Ohio because the reactions (including a detached retina and conjunctival hemorrhage) among the patients with a history of depression were so severe they could not "ethically continue the study." (60) The study included a total of 13 subjects. Eight of the subjects were patients, ranging in age from 24 to 60 years. All suffered from recurrent major depression. Five healthy hospital employees, including the hospital administrator, volunteered as a control group for the study. Each participant was asked to monitor his or her own symptoms for a checklist of headache, nervousness, dizziness, memory problems, binge eating, lower back pain, nausea, upset stomach, depression, insomnia, uncontrollable temper outburst, or other symptoms. The hospital's pharmacy prepared 300-mg capsules of aspartame for some participants, and sugar placebos for others. (NutraSweet Company denied the request from the researchers to purchase the aspartame for the study, so capsules were provided by Schwiezerhall, Inc., of New Jersey.) A 154-pound person ingested seven of the prepared capsules daily - the approximate aspartame equivalent would be 10 to 12 cans of diet soda.

Although the study was abbreviated because of the severity of the subjects' symptoms, the researchers did find the incidence of headaches in participants taking aspartame increased and that persons with a history of depression demonstrated significant adverse reactions while taking aspartame. They also reported adverse symptoms for the group taking aspartame increased significantly. (60) Walton, then chief of psychiatry at New York's Jamestown Hospital and Chautauqua County mental health commissioner, reported a case study of a patient who reacted adversely to aspartame. His 54-year-old female patient "suddenly experienced a grand mal seizure followed by profound behavior changes." Some of the personality changes included euphoria, the flight of ideas, increased motor activity and insomnia. A history of the woman's eating habits revealed she had been accustomed to drinking about a gallon of sugar-sweetened iced tea daily. In the weeks before her seizure, she had switched from sugar-sweetened tea to an iced tea product containing aspartame. After reviewing her case, Walton advised her to eliminate the aspartame product, upon which she returned to normal and the symptoms subsided. (66) Walton questions the reliability and validity of studies for the safety of aspartame funded by the NutraSweet Company. "I'm absolutely convinced," he says. "I know it causes seizures. I'm convinced also that it definitely causes behavioral changes. I'm very angry that this substance is on the market. I personally question the reliability and validity of any studies funded by the NutraSweet Company." In the 1987 proceedings of the First International Meeting on Dietary Phenylalanine and Brain Function, he also presented either other seizures cases, along with case studies of mania, panic attacks and weight gain induced by aspartame use.

In 'NO-NONSENSE NUTRITION FOR KIDS' Annette Natow and Jo-Ann Heslin writes "animal and human studies have shown that aspartame cause chemical changes in the brain. More research is needed to determine if aspartame is a health hazard." (76) The questions about the validity of the Searle research and tests of aspartame date back to 1976 when FDA was uncertain about the animal test data provided by Searle. The FDA administrators asked Sam Skinner, former U.S. attorney in the Northern District of Illinois, to convene a grand jury to investigate discrepancies in the animal test data provided by Searle. (15) On January 10, 1977, RDA chief counsel, Richard Merril, sent a 33-page letter to Skinner repeating the request for the grand jury investigation "into apparent violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act...and False Reports to the Government Act...by G. D. Searle Company". (12) The letter also charged that Searle concealed material facts and made false statements in reports of animal studies conducted to establish the safety of the food additive aspartame. The studies cities for investigation had been conducted in 1972, and five-year statutes of limitation for criminal prosecution were due to expire on October 10, and December 8, 1977. (7) The statutes of limitation ran out before any criminal charges were ever filed. In 1977 Skinner was offered and accepted a job with Sidley and Austin, the law firm that represented Searle. While still U.S. district attorney, Skinner did eventually excuse himself from the Searle investigation.

The next U.S. attorney, Tom Sullivan, then dropped NutraSweet from the grand jury investigation. (7) In 1988 Senator Metzenbaum challenged Skinner's nomination for appointment as U.S. Secretary of Transportation. Metzenbaum issued a press release that said Skinner "failed to launch a grand jury probe of G.D. Searle, the manufacturer of NutraSweet, which was requested by the Food and Drug Administration. A year after the FDA brought Skinner allegations of fraudulent safety tests by Searle, Skinner took a job with the law firm that defended Searle in the case." (7) Although Metzenbaum did later say he would not object to the nomination to the position of Secretary of Transportation, he said that Skinner told him that "he may have made mistakes in his handling the NutraSweet investigation." The studies under scrutiny were the purview of Dr. Harry Waisman, a researcher at the University of Wisconsin's Regional Primate Center. He was asked to compare toxicity effects from aspartame (particularly seizures and learning defects from brain damage) with those from phenylalanine, a primary ingredient in aspartame. Waisman's 52-week toxicity study on seven infant Rhesus monkeys fed a diet containing aspartame did not include a control group for comparison. The results of the study, submitted to Searle in 1972, showed the death of one monkey after 300 days, the administration of aspartame halted on two monkeys after 200 days, and four monkeys that received aspartame for 365 days. The FDA, in a report on the tests, said that no behavioral or learning tests were undertaken on the monkeys. Former FDA Commissioner Alexander Schmidt, now deceased, said the tests were "shoddy" and "far less than perfect "(79)

A second study initiated by Searle was to have been a 104-week toxicity study on the effects of aspartame on hamsters. The study was halted prematurely after 46 weeks because of the unexpectedly high mortality rate in both control and treated animals following an outbreak of diarrhea among the test animals. The FDA, including submission of false information, noted other inconsistencies in the tests upon review, and reports that were written to convey impressions more favorable than underlying data would support. (7,16) The FDA researchers also said that their agency needed more adequate and better-controlled studies. They said the FDA must base its recommendations on sound data because the substance could be part of the daily diet of every American. (25) Schmidt commented that "if you're approving a food additive that will be taken by children around the world, you will accept absolutely no risk, particularly if it's a non-nutritive sweetener." (7)

The FDA task force observed laboratory methods at Searle from April 25 to August 4, 1977. The Bressler Report (named for team leader Jerome Bressler) identified major discrepancies, including "substantial differences between gross observation on pathology sheets when compared with those submitted to the FDA" in a rat toxicology test of aspartame. (16) According to the Bressler Report, one rat even appeared resurrected. It stated, "Observed records indicated that animal A23LM was alive at week 88, dead from week 92 to week 104, alive at week 108, and dead at week 112." (16) The actual meal fed to the rats was also in question. Raymond Schroeder, a former Searle employee, said in an FDA interview on July 13, 1977, that "the particles of DKP were large enough to allow the rats to discriminate between the DKP and the basal diet." In 1982, representatives of the carbonated beverage industry asked Monte to evaluate the scientific data for aspartame. Monte said "I was stunned by the poor quality research and recommended against aspartame's use in carbonated beverages. I understood that the industry was going to abide by my evaluation but something turned them around."

In 1984, Florence Graves, vice president of COMMON CAUSE wrote: "NutraSweet has been touted as the most tested food additive in history, but our investigation reveals such serious flaws in the government's approval of NutraSweet that Congress should begin its own investigation immediately." (38) A 1987 report released by the General Accounting Office, "FDA Food Additive Approval Process Followed for Aspartame," included information that waved red flags of potential calamity.

Some of the findings in the report: (11)

The rat DKP Study showed a significant incidence of uterine polyps in rats fed at the two highest dose levels as compared to rats not fed DKP. Review teams later said the polyps were not cancerous, precancerous, or potentially cancerous.

The Center for Safety and Nutrition advised Searle that because it had not submitted studies for evaluating long-term effects of DKP, aspartame was not approved for products that could have an appreciable breakdown to DKP.

An investigative team report showed that examination of rat fetuses and the reporting of the results in two teratology studies were inadequate.

Dr. John Olney, psychiatrist, neuropathologist, and professor at Washington University in St. Louis found 12 brain tumors in 320 dosed rats and none in 120 control rats when he examined FDA files on aspartame animal studies in 1978.

Olney advised that the high number of brain tumors was unusual. Olney voiced another concern based on his research. He showed that when glutamate and aspartic acid are ingested together each agent augments the neurotoxic effects of the other.

In a 1981 interview at Washington University, Olney said, "Chemicals marketed as food additives are consumed without supervision by hundreds of millions, most of whom do not know they are ingesting the additive, do not derive health benefits from it and have no understanding of its adverse effects." Olney, along with consumer activist attorney James Turner, initiated court action over aspartame. In a 1986 interview, Turner said he had spent 15 years battling approval of aspartame because "it's hurting people." Monte also called the scientific data supplied on aspartame as "poor quality research" and said he recommended against aspartame's use in carbonated beverages. Dr. Jeffrey Bada, a chemistry professor at the University of California at San Diego, warned against heating aspartame and the resultant internal rearrangement of its chemical structure.

The late Dr. M. Adrian Gross, an FDA toxicologist, spoke out against aspartame in August 1, 1985, Congressional Record. Gross, who took part in on-site investigations at Searle laboratories, said the study carried out by Searle to show the safety of aspartame were "to a large extent unreliable." He said, "at least one of those studies has established beyond any reasonable doubt that aspartame is capable of inducing brain tumors in experimental animals and that this...is of extremely high significance."( 42) Gross also testified that because aspartame was capable of producing brain tumors and brain cancer, the FDA should not have been able to set an allowable daily intake of the substance at any level. He said at least one of Searle's studies "has established beyond any responsible doubt that aspartame is capable of inducing brain tumors in experiments animals and that this predisposition of it is of extremely high significance..."

In view of these indications that the cancer-causing potential of aspartame is a matter that had been established way beyond any reasonable doubt, one can ask: "What is the reason for the apparent refusal by the FDA to invoke for this food additive the so-called Delaney Amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act?" The Delaney Amendment makes it illegal to allow any residues of cancer-causing chemicals in foods. In his concluding testimony, Gross asked, "Given the [cancer causing the potential of aspartame] how would the FDA justify its position that it views a certain amount of aspartame as constituting an allowable daily intake or 'safe' level of it? Is that position in effect not equivalent to setting a 'tolerance' for this food additive and thus a violation of that law? And it the FDA itself elects to violate the law, who is left to protect the health of the public?"

Proudly Made in the USA!

Every LifeSource Vitamins product exceeds all regulatory standards and requirements set forth in the FDA's Code of Federal Regulation. ( 21 CFR, part 111 ) as well as all Good Manufacturing Practices enforced by the FDA. CGMP's provide for systems that assure proper design, monitoring, and control of manufacturing processes and facilities. ( CGMP ).

LifeSource Vitamins: Driven by Faith ~ Powered by God

Have Questions on this or any other product or health issue for you or a loved one? It can be overwhelming we know. Call us, we will walk you through what supplements will help you and which ones you really don’t need. It’s what we do! Toll-Free: 800-567-8122

LifeSource Vitamins – Founded in 1992

100% of our profits are donated to Christian Organizations like these and many others worldwide:

Campus Crusade for Christ - CRU

The Jesus Film Project

World Vision

The Tim Tebow Foundation

Compassion International

Samaritan’s Purse

The Herman and Sharron Show on CTN (Christian Television Network) and many more…


E-mail Us: [email protected]

or Call Us: 800.567.8122

We Are Built on Compassion - Driven by Faith & Powered by God!

*Disclaimer: None of the above statements have been evaluated by the FDA. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. As always, consult your physician before taking any and all supplements. LifeSource Vitamins. Individual results may vary.

Disclaimer: All the information contained throughout this website is based upon the opinions of the founder of LifeSource Vitamins, Bruce Brightman, and the entire team at LifeSource Vitamins whose relentless research and studies have been ongoing since 1992. Other articles and information are based on the opinions of the authors, who retain the copyright as marked in the article. The information on this site is not intended to replace your health care professional, but to enhance your relationship with them. Doing your own studying and research and taking your health care into your own hands is always best, especially in partnership with your health care professional.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medications, or have any medical conditions, always consult your health care professional before taking supplements based on the information on this site.

LifeSource Vitamins: from the nutrients we choose, to the way we run our business, we answer to God in all we do!